Search for: "Word v. USA"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
Dodd v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
(U.S.S.C., June 12, 2017, Henson v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:47 am
Here's a quick overview of the proposed Final Judgment ("PFJ") filed earlier today in USA v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 12:19 pm
Cristostomo v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
Banks v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
This is particularly true for weakly distinctive or even non-distinctive elements such as the word ‘team’. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:20 am
In Mayfield v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 6:35 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Rimini Street v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:55 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
These records included information about the telephone numbers involved in a call and the date and time of the call, but they did not include the words spoken in the call. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
Words like “relevant” have been stretched far beyond any reasonable interpretation. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:39 pm
NSA and Smith v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:00 pm
” Noto v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:21 am
Today's case, Espenscheid v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:59 am
In the words of managing partner Neil V. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:56 am
The TTAB’s ruling was vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings (Omaha Steaks International, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am
On November 1, 2010 at 8:55 (they got started early), the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in USA v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:33 am
" Interesting use of quotation marks around the word "hired," isn't it? [read post]
